Harris’ Cap on Out-of-Pocket Prescription Drug Costs Would Save Patients Billions, Must Be Matched With Price Cuts 

WASHINGTON, D.C. — More than 900,000 Americans would have saved $3,000 a year on their prescription medications under Vice President Kamala Harris’ plan to cap out-of-pocket drug costs at $2,000 annually for patients with private insurance, were such a policy in place in 2022, according to new Public Citizen research. But unless cost caps are passed alongside measures to cut prescription drug prices, there is a risk of shifting costs onto taxpayers. 

The Harris proposal is an extension of the cap established by the Inflation Reduction Act for Medicare Part D patients, which has saved 1.5 million seniors nearly $1 billion in the first half of this year alone.

Roughly 30% of Americans do not take medications as prescribed due to high drug costs. Many are cutting pills in half, skipping doses, not filling prescriptions and taking over-the-counter-drugs in lieu of their prescribed meds.

Public Citizen researchers found patients would have saved nearly $3 billion in 2022 if Harris’ proposed cap were in place that year. Public Citizen co-president Robert Weissman says this data proves Harris’ plan is not only feasible but a crucial first step to help Americans afford their medications.

“No one should ever have to choose between taking their medicine and putting food on the table,” said Weissman. “Vice President Harris is working to bring relief to patients who are struggling to afford to care for themselves as part of her bigger plan to lower drug costs. This proposed cap must work in tandem with a bigger, bolder congressional effort to stop pharmaceutical companies from price gouging treatments. We cannot let Big Pharma continue to take advantage of American patients and put more strain on our healthcare system.”

How a Trump Administration Might Force Public Subsidies For Politically-Favored Electricity Generators, Including Coal Plants

By Tyson Slocum, Energy Program Director, Public Citizen

Last month in a speech to the Economic Club of New York, former President Donald J. Trump pledged to “cut energy prices in half, or more, within 12 months of taking office”. Experts across the political spectrum correctly mocked this absurd boast, noting that one Trump tool to achieve this fanciful pledge is to “drill, baby, drill”, which is not policy, but political rhetoric meant to excite his base, according to a conservative scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. Five days later during the September 10 debate with Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump claimed he would lift oil production to “five times, four times, five times higher” than under the start of the Biden/Harris administration.

Oil production was 11.2 million barrels of oil per day when Biden/Harris took office in January 2021, and it was last measured at 13.2 million in July 2024—or 18.5% higher, making the United States not just the planet’s largest producer, but the largest of any country in the history of the world. Trump’s claim that he’ll boost that 4x-5x is ridiculed by industry insiders as “nonsense” in part because the massive production increase would crash prices, making oil unprofitable. Indeed, proving Trump doesn’t understand the oil industry, the CEO of two U.S. oil producers have been sanctioned by federal regulators for conspiring with OPEC to reduce domestic oil production in an effort to artificially prop up prices. Despite Trump not understanding basic economics of the oil industry, he was at least blunt in asking them to give his campaign $1 billion in exchange for a quid pro quo delivery of environmental and tax rollbacks favored by the industry, met with oil executives a second time in the heart of the Permian Basin raising cash for his campaign, prompting me to observe that oil CEOs provide Trump with “a bottomless well of cash”. While Trump’s absurdly exaggerated promises of oil production levels can be dismissed as empty campaign rhetoric for an uninformed base, what’s more worrying is his quid-pro-quo promise to Big Oil to roll back taxes and environmental regulations to benefit the industry in exchange for campaign donations. This is not only a blatant act of corruption, it also spells utter disaster for the environment and the future lives of American families across the country.

Trump’s plan as outlined before the Economic Club of New York to achieve a “massive increase in domestic energy supply” in oil, natural gas and electricity is predicated on his proposed policy of national energy emergency declaration. It’s Déjà vu all over again with Trump’s team pursuing yet another pay-to-play emergency declaration corruption playbook. To understand what Trump intends with his national energy emergency 2.0, we simply review the extensive paper trail from his Presidency (of course, the easiest path to lower electricity prices is simply to deploy more wind and solar, which is not part of Trump’s plan).

Let’s take a brisk walk through Trump’s first term efforts to declare a national emergency to bail out failing fossil fuel donors:

  • Just 67 days after Trump’s inauguration, Bob Murray—then-CEO of coal miner Murray Energy, who passed away four years ago—submitted an “Action Plan” to Trump’s Secretary of Energy Rick Perry outlining a list of demands, including “Implement Emergency Actions Relative To The Security And Resiliency Of The Electric Power Grids”, where DOE would “issue an emergency directive to have an immediate study done of the security and resiliency of our electric power grids. DOE will direct that no power plants having an available fuel supply of at least forty-five days be closed during the study period”.
  • Career White House lawyers were correct that the emergency powers vested in the Secretary of Energy in Section 202c of the Federal Power Act were not appropriate to use simply to provide a financial lifeline to well-connected power plant and coal mine owners. Rather, such authorities could only be used during a genuine emergency, typically stemming from a natural disaster. But Murray pressed on, and the next month Perry would deliver for Bob Murray: On September 28, 2017, Secretary Perry proposed an emergency rule (Docket RM18-1) for final action by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to require consumers to bail out coal and nuclear power plants rendered “prematurely uneconomic” by cheaper gas and renewables by only providing bailouts to those generation units that could demonstrate a 90 day onsite fuel supply (up from Murray’s proposed 45 days). The cover letter of the emergency filing was signed by Deputy General Counsel for Energy Policy Bernard L. McNamee II, who Trump would later appoint to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
  • Six days later, I was asked to testify before Congress about the plan, where I noted: “The DOE rulemaking request argues that wholesale power markets are not adequately pricing the “resiliency attributes” of “fuel secure” generation. DOE then proposes to guarantee full cost-recovery for units that can demonstrate a 90-day on-site fuel supply, as the DOE claims that the continued operation of such units is essential for grid resilience. Conveniently for the nuclear and coal industries, only their units would qualify for such bailouts. Coal-fired power plants typically have such on-site reserves of coal piled next to their generation units, and nuclear power plants have onsite nuclear fuel to meet the standard. Recent events contradict this arbitrary standard. Hurricane Harvey, which made landfall on coastal Texas in August 2017, dumped so much rain that “[t]he external coal pile at [NRG’s] W.A. Parish became so saturated with rainwater that coal was unable to be delivered into the silos from the conveyer system . . . Having a 90-day on-site fuel source is therefore not an adequate measure of reliability or resilience.”
  • On January 8, 2018, FERC voted 5-0 to terminate Bob Murray’s emergency DOE coal bailout, in part because two of the largest owners of coal power plants at the time (Dynegy and NRG) argued that the bailout would ruin the competitive markets that offered their non-coal power fleets to earn tons of profits. FERC of course is an independent agency that Trump couldn’t unilaterally control (although we warned of Trump trying to do just that in May and June of 2017). It also didn’t help Trump that the America Petroleum Institute opposed the coal bailout, principally because the handouts excluded natural gas.

Given the well-documented history of Trump aggressively seeking to utilize national emergency declarations as a cover to funnel billions of dollars in taxpayer and ratepayer subsidies to politically-favored owners of coal power plants, Trump’s current campaign pledges of a “national energy emergency declaration” must be taken as a serious threat to energy affordability and sustainability.

Providing Home Care for Seniors Through Medicare Would Bring Massive Relief

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, Vice President Kamala Harris announced plans to provide long-term care benefits through Medicare to seniors in their own homes. Currently, seniors can only use Medicare for limited post acute care and must rely on Medicaid for longer-term care. The availability of home-based care through Medicaid varies by state. 

Public Citizen co-president Lisa Gilbert released the following statement: 

“Improving and expanding Medicare is job one in order to fix our broken health care system. Home health expansion through Medicare is a smart and desperately needed place to start. It would provide relief for families across America struggling to take care of their loved ones. 

“This important expansion would finally allow Medicare to cover crucial services where many beneficiaries would prefer to receive them—in the safety and comfort of their homes. Such an expansion would lay the groundwork for even further improvements and expansions to Medicare including hearing, dental and vision services. A low out-of-pocket cap on medical expenses would ensure seniors can afford to get the care they need, and by reigning in Medicare Advantage overpayments, we could fund many of these priorities. 

“We must continue to expand the availability of Medicare by lowering the qualifying age, so we can finally build a health care system that ensures that every American can get the care they need when they need it without going bankrupt.”

###

Fact Checking Vance on Trade Claims Ahead of Tuesday Debate

WASHINGTON, D.C. — At Tuesday’s Vice Presidential debate, J.D. Vance will likely make a number of claims about trade policy and American jobs that he has been consistently making on the campaign trail. Vance has embraced populist rhetoric on trade to connect with voters’ real frustrations related to the hollowing out of the manufacturing sector and increased income inequality from past corporate-dominated trade deals, but many of his claims are disingenuous or flat out wrong. 

Some of Vance’s claims about trade and jobs to look out for: 

Vance’s Anticipated False Claim: Vice President Harris voted to keep the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in place when Trump renegotiated it. 

Reality: Vance has continued to make this claim, which has earned him four pinocchios by a Washington Post fact check. As a Senator, Vice President Harris voted against the US Mexico Canada Agreement (USMCA) because she believed the deal wasn’t strong enough on climate protections to justify her vote. Prior to that vote, she said she would not have supported the original NAFTA because it didn’t do enough to protect American workers. More recently, Vice President Harris said that the USMCA “made it far too easy for a major auto company like Stellantis to break their word to workers by outsourcing American jobs.”

Vance’s Anticipated False Claim: Trump’s USMCA solved the issue of U.S. jobs going to Mexico. 

Reality: The U.S.-Mexico trade deficit has gone up since the implementation of the USMCA, not down. American companies continued outsourcing jobs to Mexico as the USMCA went into law. In one case, a manufacturer did so only months after receiving $10 million in COVID-19 relief money from the Trump Administration. In another case, just a year after the USMCA took effect, an auto parts manufacturer controlled by Trump’s then Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross outsourced 300 jobs to Mexico. In the first six months of 2020, the DOL approved 15 petitions for trade assistance related to auto parts factories moving to Mexico.

Vance’s Anticipated False Claim: NAFTA was a “Democrat” trade deal. 

Reality: NAFTA was negotiated by a Republican President, George Bush. When Congress voted on the deal, the majority of Democrats in Congress voted against it, and the majority of Republicans voted for it.

Vance’s Anticipated False Claim: Key pieces of Biden administration legislation, like the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), help China and sent a lot of jobs to China. 

Reality: The Chinese government is furious about the IRA and has actually initiated a dispute against the United States at the World Trade Organization (WTO), arguing that the legislation violates WTO rules by preferencing and protecting U.S. jobs. Last year, Vice President Harris helped bring the trade deficit with China to its lowest point in 15 years. Under Trump’s presidency, it hit the highest level in U.S. history. The IRA has had such a big impact that a number of Congressional Republicans have been urging Trump and Vance to not follow through on their threat to gut the IRA’s tax credits because they are creating jobs in their districts.

Vance’s Anticipated False Claim:The Biden administration protected green energy jobs at the expense of American jobs. Trump protected American jobs.

Reality: Trump made empty promises to protect manufacturing jobs, while the Biden-Harris administration has made real investments to create and support manufacturing jobs. While in office, for instance, Trump promised workers in Lordstown, Ohio that he would save their jobs from being outsourced to Mexico. But when the last of over 4,000 of those jobs went to Mexico under his watch, he did nothing. Thanks to the historic investments into clean energy manufacturing that Vice President Harris has helped put in place, over 1,000 auto jobs have come back to Lordstown in the form of EV and battery manufacturing. These jobs are part of massive manufacturing investments that are going disproportionately to towns that have lost jobs in the past. 

Vance’s Anticipated False Claim: The Biden administration adopted “the Donald Trump agenda” with respect to tariffs.

Reality: The Biden-Harris administration has continued to use tariffs in strategic industries to counter unfair trade practices by China, and actually strengthened them after a mandatory 4-year review found weaknesses regarding electric vehicle supply chains and other green energy products. Unlike Trump, the Biden-Harris administration understands that, while tariffs are a strategic tool, they must be matched with real investments in domestic manufacturing, like those in the IRA, in order to protect jobs.

Trump’s Alleged Crypto Platform Is a Pathetic Scheme To Scam Americans

Contact: Emily Leach, eleach@citizen.org 

Washington, D.C. — On Thursday, Donald Trump appeared to promote a family cryptocurrency project on the social media platform he owns, Truth Social.

Robert Weissman, Public Citizen co-president, said:

“The Scammer-in-Chief is at it again.

“Donald Trump and his family are promoting a family cryptocurrency project, once again trying to exploit his public profile for personal gain.

“It’s bad enough that Trump is luring people — primarily his own supporters — into a rip-off, Ponzi-scheme business. It’s pathetic and outrageous that he tries to channel people’s legitimate anger against banks and financial elites into his own personal grift.

“Worst of all, campaign support from Crypto Bros and, now, an opportunity to scam everyday Americans have led Trump to flip his position on the industry, with dangerous potential consequences if he’s elected.”

DeSantis Should Take Down, Disavow Deepfakes

For Immediate Release: June 13, 2023

Contact: David Rosen, drosen@citizen.org

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Public Citizen today called on recently declared presidential candidate Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis to pledge not to use generative A.I. or deepfake technology to mislead or defraud the electorate – and to take down a June 5 video from his campaign that includes multiple A.I.-fabricated images of President Donald Trump embracing Dr. Anthony Fauci.

In May, Public Citizen called on the two major parties and their presidential candidates to pledge not to use generative A.I. or deepfake technology to mislead or defraud the electorate. Political operatives now have the means to produce ads with highly realistic computer-generated images, audio, and video of opponents that appear genuine, but are completely fabricated.

“Generative A.I. now poses a significant threat to truth and democracy as we know it,” said Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen. “Every party and candidate should commit not to employ deceptive deepfakes, which definitionally involve tricking the public into believing something that is not true.”

Deceptive deepfakes are a categorical threat to democratic integrity and do not favor one candidate or party over another, according to Public Citizen.

Public Citizen in May also called for the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to issue a rule banning candidates from using of manipulative and potentially dangerous generative A.I. technologies in campaign ads.

One particularly alarming scenario is that an “October surprise” deepfake video released shortly before Election Day could go viral – with no ability for voters to determine that it’s fake, no time for a candidate to deny it, and no way to demonstrate convincingly that it’s fake. Both parties, their presidential candidates, and the FEC can prevent this (and many other) easily foreseeable abuses of the technology by disavowing and banning deceptive deepfakes in political campaigns now.

###

Gov. Ron DeSantis Should Reject A.I.-Generated Deepfakes, Take Down Campaign Video Including Alleged Deepfake Images

Governor Ron DeSantis
Ron DeSantis For President
P.O. Box 3696
Tallahassee, FL 32315

Dear Governor Ron DeSantis,

We are writing to urge you to pledge not to use deepfake technology to trick voters and to urge your DeSantis War Room account on Twitter (@DesantisWarRoom) to take down the campaign video posted on June 5, which uses deepfake technology.

Twenty-five seconds into the campaign video, which Twitter statistics show has been viewed 9.1 million times, there is a collage of images juxtaposed with the words “REAL LIFE TRUMP” that includes three images of President Trump physically embracing Dr. Anthony Fauci that appear to be deepfakes created using generative A.I. (artificial intelligence). The apparent deepfakes were first identified by AFP.

Experts have noted that the three images – on the top left, bottom center, and bottom right of the collage – bear hallmarks of being deepfakes generated using deceptive A.I. technology. The unnatural poses, errors in the White House signage in the background, and smooth, plastic-seeming texture of hair and skin are among the most striking indictors that the images are deepfakes created using generative A.I. Reverse image search efforts have also failed to locate sources of the original photos – another indicator that the images were created using A.I. tools.

Generative A.I. and deepfake technology – a type of artificial intelligence used to create convincing images, audio and video hoaxes – is evolving very rapidly. This is not a technology that advantages one candidate over another. Anyone can use it to deceptive effect. That’s why all political players have an equal interest in preventing abuse of this technology.

Beyond the shared interest of all political candidates in not being victimized by a deepfake fraud, there is a broader public interest. Deepfake technology poses a genuine challenge to the future functioning of our democracy. If voters cannot trust the authenticity of what they see and hear online, it’s hard to know how our democracy can work.

We call on you to:

  1. Take down the June 5, 2023, campaign video containing deceptive deepfake imagery;
  2. Commit immediately to stop using deceptive deepfake technology;
  3. Urge all independent committees and supporter equally to pledge not to use deepfake technology to deceive voters; and
  4. Call for rapid passage of legislation making it illegal to use deepfake technology to deceive voters.

Sincerely,

Robert Weissman
President, Public Citizen

New Hampshire Deserves Clean Elections

Statement by Aquene Freechild, Co-Director, Public Citizen’s Democracy is For People Campaign

Note: U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) today sent a letter to her general election opponent, Bryant “Corky” Messner, urging him to sign a “Clean Elections Agreement” committing to 1) denounce and report any offers of assistance from foreign entities; 2) disavow tactics intended to suppress the vote; and 3) discourage third party spending by pledging to donate 50% of the cost of any outside advertisements to charity.

We applaud Sen. Shaheen’s commitment to transparency in campaign funding. The disastrous Citizens United v. FEC ruling in 2010 ushered in an era of unfettered corporate cash to influence elections that undermines our democracy. The candidates themselves must step up and limit the influence of third-party spending in creative ways.

It should go without saying that any foreign interference attempts should be reported to the authorities, and that candidates should be on high alert for attempts by foreign governments to interfere in our democracy.

Sen. Scott Brown and Elizabeth Warren signed the “People’s Pledge” in 2012 as candidates in the Massachusetts Senate race, agreeing that if either candidate benefited from outside group advertising, that candidate would donate half the cost of that ad to charity. The Clean Elections Agreement offers an expanded version of that pledge and we urge Mr. Messner to sign it.

Through pledges like the Clean Elections Agreement, candidates can declare their independence from election meddling. Citizens United left us with a Wild West campaign finance environment. By pledging to ensure that their campaigns are funded transparently, and not by outside groups that can spend unlimited amounts, candidates can help restore clean elections for the people.

Top Presidential Candidates to Outline Views on Democracy at Citizens United Forum in Des Moines

Eight Advocacy Groups Host ‘We The People 2020: Protecting Our Democracy a Decade After Citizens United’ Forum; HuffPost to Moderate

Contact: Angela Bradbery, Public Citizen, abradbery@citizen.org, (202) 588-7741
Jay Riestenberg, Common Cause, jriestenberg@commoncause.org, (202) 736-5741
Laurie Kinney, People For the American Way, lkinney@pfaw.org, (202) 467-2307
Bawadden Sayed, End Citizens United Action Fund, bawadden@endcitizensunited.org, (202) 798-5253
Anna Zuccaro, MoveOn, press@moveon.org
Liam Sullivan, Brady, lsullivan@bradyunited.org, (202) 370-8128

DES MOINES, IOWA – Top presidential candidates will speak at a forum to mark 10 years after the U.S. Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision and discuss their plans to end the dominance of big money in politics, protect the right to vote, ensure fair courts and create a democracy that works for all of us. The event, “We The People 2020: Protecting Our Democracy a Decade After Citizens United,” is hosted by a diverse group of advocacy organizations and will be moderated by HuffPost. It will be held in Des Moines, Iowa, two days before the 10-year mark of the court’s decision and just weeks before the Iowa caucus.

Candidates scheduled to attend include U.S. Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and former Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick. Pete Buttigieg, mayor of South Bend, Ind., will also appear via livestream.  Additional attendees may be added, and attendees are subject to change.

HuffPost’s Amanda Terkel and Kevin Robillard will moderate. Press can RSVP here. An ASL interpreter will be available at the event.

SPONSORING ORGANIZATIONS:

Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence
Common Cause
End Citizens United Action Fund
MoveOn Political Action
NAACP
People For the American Way
Progress Iowa
Public Citizen

WHERE: Des Moines Curate Event Center
322 E. Court Ave.
Des Moines, Iowa

WHEN: 3 p.m. CST, Sunday, Jan. 19. A livestream of the event will be available. 

SUBJECTS ADDRESSED: Candidates will address the most pressing issues facing our democracy, specifically relating to:

  • Campaign finance reforms, including corporate PAC donations and how candidates have opted to finance their campaigns.
  • Anti-corruption and ethics issues, including lobbying restrictions and corporate influence in politics.
  • Voting rights, including access to polling locations, early voting, felon re-enfranchisement, the restoration of the Voting Rights Act and gerrymandering.
  • Election security, including cybersecurity and election infrastructure.
  • Fair courts and appointing judges who believe the Constitution protects all of us, not just the wealthy and powerful.

These issues go to the heart of our democracy. They impact whose voice is heard and whether progress can be made on issues that a majority of Americans want to see addressed, such as access to health care, ending gun violence and education.

About Brady:

Brady has one powerful mission — to unite all Americans against gun violence. We work across Congress, the courts, and our communities with over 90 grassroots chapters, bringing together young and old, red and blue, and every shade of color to find common ground in common sense. In the spirit of our namesakes Jim and Sarah Brady, we have fought for over 45 years to take action, not sides, and we will not stop until this epidemic ends. It’s in our hands. Learn more: https://www.bradyunited.org 

About Common Cause:

Common Cause is a nonpartisan, grassroots organization dedicated to upholding the core values of American democracy. We work to create open, honest, and accountable government that serves the public interest; promote equal rights, opportunity, and representation for all; and empower all people to make their voices heard in the political process. Learn more: https://www.commoncause.org 

About End Citizens United:

End Citizens United Action Fund works with four million members to call their elected officials, host petition drives, participate in letter to the editor campaigns, and join coalitions of other grassroots advocacy groups to pass legislation to help get big money out of politics. Learn more: https://endcitizensunited.org 

About MoveOn Political Action:

MoveOn Political Action represents the collective will of MoveOn’s millions of members at the ballot box by using people power to help elect progressive candidates. MoveOn members live in every congressional district in the country and come from all walks of life. We organize together to advance a vision of a world with a place of honor and dignity for everyone—where all are welcome, where we take care of each other, and where everyone is set up to thrive. moveon.org 

About the NAACP:

The mission of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) is to secure the political, educational, social, and economic equality of rights in order to eliminate race-based discrimination and ensure the health and well-being of all persons. Learn more: https://www.naacp.org 

About People For the American Way:

People For the American Way is a progressive advocacy organization founded to fight right-wing extremism and build a democratic society that implements the ideals of freedom, equality, opportunity and justice for all. We encourage civic participation, defend fundamental rights, and fight to dismantle systemic barriers to equitable opportunity. Learn more: http://www.pfaw.org

About Progress Iowa:

Progress Iowa is a multi-issue progressive advocacy organization. Year-round, we promote progressive ideas and causes with creative earned media strategies, targeted email campaigns, and cutting-edge new media. Learn more: https://progressiowa.org 

About Public Citizen:

Public Citizen is a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization that champions the public interest in the halls of power. We defend democracy, resist corporate power and work to ensure that government works for the people – not for big corporations. Founded in 1971, we now have 500,000 members and supporters throughout the country. Learn more: https://www.citizen.org

Warren Proves Medicare for All Is Affordable

Statements From Public Citizen Experts

Note: Today, U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) released her plan for paying for Medicare for All. She estimates total systemwide costs of around $52 trillion over the next decade, with most of the cost covered by existing funding. To cover the additional federal government spending, she is proposing a series of mechanisms, including an employer Medicare contribution, where companies would pay Medicare for All instead of insurers, which would save companies around $200 billion compared to current projected spending. She also proposed that states continue to help fund our health care system. Finally, there would be several additional tax reforms, including a tax on Wall Street trades, tax increases for wealthy individuals with more than $1 billion in total assets, closure of tax haven loopholes, tax enforcement improvements, cuts to military spending and savings from immigration reform efforts.

“While the cost argument against Medicare for All is almost always being made in bad faith by those who profit from our broken health care system, Warren shows that paying for Medicare for All through commonsense changes to how we pay for health care in America can work, while saving huge amounts of money. We can either continue spending wastefully and leaving tens of millions of Americans uninsured even more underinsured, and more than 100 million at the whim of employers and greedy insurance companies, or we can use that money to create a health care system that would improve Medicare and expand it to everyone in the U.S., and reap huge savings while improving the health and well-being of Americans for generations.”

– Lisa Gilbert, vice president of legislative affairs

“We applaud Warren’s plan to pay for Medicare for All. It highlights just how much we are wasting on our inefficient for-profit health care system and how much we could save through Medicare for All. Further, it shows that middle-class Americans are spending far too much while getting far too little, with tens of millions of Americans going without the care they need. Warren’s plan would bring down spending for families and businesses, which continue to struggle to complete because of the burden that health care places on their bottom line. Finally, the plan highlights that through progressive taxation mechanisms, we can pay for Medicare for All, which finally would guarantee access to health care for everyone in the U.S. without cost barriers.”

– Eagan Kemp, health care policy advocate

“Bloated and horribly wasteful at well over $700 billion every year, the nation’s Pentagon budget is begging to be reallocated to priority domestic and human needs. We are excited that Warren has identified needless and harmful Pentagon spending as a source of funds to pay for health care and look forward to her and other candidates’ additional proposals to shift money away from the Pentagon to meet the country’s urgent priorities.”

– Robert Weissman, president